| NDA | Non-compete | |
|---|---|---|
| Restricts | Using or disclosing confidential information | Working for competitors or competing |
| Who signs | Anyone receiving secrets: businesses, investors, staff | Mostly employees and sellers of a business |
| Enforceability | Broadly enforceable if reasonable | Varies sharply by state; void for most employees in California |
| Typical length | A few years, trade secrets longer | Often 6–24 months, where allowed |
California
Business and Professions Code § 16600 says every contract restraining anyone from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business is to that extent void, and § 16600(b) directs it to be read broadly to void employee non-competes “no matter how narrowly tailored,” unless a statutory exception applies (such as the sale of a business). NDAs remain enforceable in California as long as they don’t operate as a disguised non-compete.
The FTC non-compete rule
The Federal Trade Commission issued a rule in 2024 that would have banned most non-competes. A federal court in Texas set it aside before it took effect, and on September 5, 2025 the FTC dismissed its appeals, saying it would address harmful non-competes through case-by-case enforcement instead. So there is no nationwide ban; state law governs.
Why NDAForge templates have no non-compete
Mixing a non-compete into an NDA makes the whole document harder to sign and, in some states, puts the confidentiality clauses at risk too. If you genuinely need a non-compete or non-solicit, get one drafted for the specific state by a lawyer.
Sources: Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600 (California Legislative Information); FTC, statements of September 5, 2025 on dismissal of the non-compete rule appeals; NPR, “Under Trump, the Federal Trade Commission is abandoning its ban on noncompetes” (Sept. 5, 2025).